...uct of the mind. It is behavior-based. It’s based on what you do in the world, how you act. The difference between right behavior and wrong behavior exists inherently in Nature purely and independently from your perceptions, beliefs, whims and preferences, feelings, opinions, likes and dislikes. It is written on the human heart. It has absolutely nothing to do with man’s “laws” or religious dogma, and is not a matter of debate. It does not change based on location or time period. What is moral in one place and time is moral in ALL places and times, and what is immoral in one place and time is immoral in ALL places and times. It is objective, immutable and eternal. To say “oranges are delicious” would be a construct of the mind. Oranges simply are what they are in nature. Whether or not they are considered delicious is happening in the mind. Morality, however, is entirely defined by behavior in the physical domain, whether an action taken is harmful or non-harmful to another being. You cannot arbitrarily decide for yourself the morality of your actions, you can only align your behavior to morality. A person who believes that rape is justified and morally legitimate has not made rape into a moral action, because harm is still being done to a victim. If any number of people believe that it is “right” to force others to take into their bodies a cocktail of chemicals called a “vaccine” because they believe that will keep them safe, that does not magically become morally legitimate, either. It’s still violence regardless of any proclaimed “greater good.” Behavior that imposes upon another person’s free will choice is never conducive to any greater good. Plus, your sense of safety is no one else’s responsibility. So the easiest way to understand whether or not something is moral is to ask yourself the question, “are my actions objectively causing harm to another being?” Or, if your actions are condoning harm. If the answer is yes, then those actions are Immoral. If the answer is no, then those actions are Moral. Period. That’s all it comes down to. Not what you personally feel or believe, but what is objectively harmful or non-harmful to another being. People of religious thought too often tend to equate things that go against their beliefs as being immoral. They read opinions and decrees written down millennia ago by men who themselves had no true moral knowledge, and then take them as gospel. We all have the Right to live our lives as we choose as long as we are not engaging in the THEFT of another person’s Life, Rights, Free Will, and Property. We do NOT have the “right” to impose on the lives of others just because we don’t like them or because we disagree with their life choices. To believe otherwise is to make a claim of ownership of that person’s Life, Rights, Free Will, or Property, and that’s called Slavery. Live and let live as long as no harm is being done. That’s what actual tolerance is. We must deeply understand and abide by this if we want to create true freedom in the world. This is called having and exercising Conscience, and my conscience cannot be any different from your conscience. It is knowledge that we know together, AKA Common Sense. Ultimately, moral behaviors are the actions you take that are within your Rights, and immoral behaviors are the actions you take that are NOT within your Rights. Understanding Morality is also definitively knowing what is and isn’t your property. Another being’s body, life, rights and freedom are their own property, so you do not have a moral right to harm or steal that property. As morality increases, freedom increases. As morality declines, freedom declines. Moral Relativism is why most people believe being a “law-abiding citizen” is equal to being a moral person; that it’s “justified” or right for us to do regardless of what that “law” is. It’s equating “the law” with morality or believing that obedience to “authority” is moral behavior. Nothing could be further from the truth. What is inherently wrong can never be made into something right, nor can something inherently right be made into something wrong. The truth is that Morality is Objective. There is a Right/Moral way of behaving and a Wrong/Immoral way of behaving. If your actions do not cause harm to other sentient beings or their property (which includes their body, belongings, natural rights, and freedom) then those actions are moral, therefore they are Rights. If your actions do cause harm to other sentient beings then those actions are immoral, therefore they are Wrongs. It’s that simple, yet this is not deeply understood by aggregate society. You would think that something so basic would be common knowledge (AKA Conscience), yet here we are. https://thegreatwork208716197.wordpress.com/2025/11/10/morality-is-not-a-social-construct/.
