... Made into Rights — As Morality Increases/Declines; Freedom Increases/Declines. ⚖ To better understand what you have a right to do, you need to understand what you (and others) don’t have a right to do. This is apophatic knowledge of rights. ∑ = Sum, total or aggregate. ∝ = Proportional: a corresponding, constant ratio between quantities. F = Freedom. M = Morality of behavior. i = Individual or instance. Apophasis Is affirmation through negation: to arrive at knowledge of what something is by way of known negatives, by what it isn’t. We can gain knowledge of something by gaining knowledge of what something is not; to know rights by what you (and others) don’t have a right to do. This is a negative right: what we each have a right to not have done to us. Understanding what wrongs are leads to the affirmation of their opposite: rights. What don’t we have a right to do? Behaviors that initiate harm to others. Initiating harm is a wrong, not a right. Wrongs initiate harm because they are behaviors that infringe on the property of others. A wrong — the initiation of harm — is a violation of a right; it’s an attempt to deny someone the right to own or use their rightful property. Wrongs (that which we have no right to do) are actions that initiate harm. There are 7 major/greater types of wrongs. All initiations of harm are a form of stealing. Wrongs boil down to thefts (stealing). For a theft to occur, some form of property has to be taken. Thefts are violations of property and ownership. Property and ownership are rights (something one has a right to do), so long as the acquisition of property and ownership doesn’t initiate harm. This is part of rightful property ownership. Stealing is a wrongful or false ownership claim. To better understand wrongs as thefts, we need to know what we rightfully own (that can be stolen), because acquiring and owning it didn’t initiate harm. There are basic ownerships inherent to each individual being by virtue of their existence and willful agency. A right is an action that we have a right to do. It’s right (not wrong) behavior (moral). We have the right to drink, eat, walk, jump, breathe, speak, etc. Since there are nearly an infinite array of possibile actions we have a right to do, knowing all our rights in the positive sense (“the right to do X…”) is not practical. Positive rights also have a dangerous wrongful application whereby someone believes they have a “right” to be provided with something, like the “right” to housing, water, food, employment, ‘X’. This is not a True or Natural Right. This forces others against their will (i.e. violence) to be “obligated” to provide ‘xX’ to others. No one has a responsibility to provide you with any positive right. Everyone is responsible for their own actions, and to not infringe on or violate the rights of others. You don’t owe anybody anything other than not violating their rights. Do you own yourself, or does someone else own you? You direct, control, rule and govern your actions/behaviors. No one else has control over your body. You have autonomy. You govern yourself. You don’t have a right to govern others. Others don’t have a right to govern you. You own you and decide what happens to that which you rightfully own (rightful property). This is the Self-Ownership Principle. Your actions can rightfully acquire property through original appropriation or voluntary exchange. Original appropriation is being the first to mix your physical labor (actions) with unowned resources in nature. Mixing of your own personal labor is required, otherwise anyone can falsely (wrongfully) claim ownership of anything anywhere. Voluntary exchange Is non-coercive exchange. You have free will volition to control your rightfully acquired property. Modification of property or transfer of ownership requires voluntary agreement from the rightful owner. All bodies (animals) are a priori owned by their natural owner (consciousness) that controls (will) their own body. Only unowned natural resources can be acquired as property under original appropriation. Self-owned bodies cannot rightfully transfer ownership of their bodies. The natural a priori owner forever controls their body. This is the 1st Natural Right that the other property rights derive from. Natural (property) Rights are an inherent birthright that exist by virtue of our existence. We exist in nature, with self-ownership as a property/attribute of that existence. It can’t be taken away. Respecting the autonomy and property of others is to live by the Non-Aggression Principle (NAP); to not initiate aggression against another’s property. Aggression being an uninvited, unjust and undue threat of or actual physical obstruction of what one has a right to do with their property (with some exceptions for unrectified injustices). Violations of the NAP open the doors for enacting the Self-Defense Principle: physical intervention, obstruction or interference of the one doing the violating. We have to know what we own and don’t own, rightfully. In order to have legitimate claims of rightful property ownership, there are some principles to adhere to. 1. Rightful possession – acquired without violating rights (initiating harm): a) original appropriation or b) voluntary exchange. 2. Control usage – sell (Permanent exchange) or rent (temporary exchange) rightful possessions. – an area you use and put to use for living. – Claiming ownership of large bodies of water/land is beyond your ability to mix labor with or claim usage of, and deprives others of the ability to do that. 3. Maintain responsibility for what happens with it and to it. – body’s behavior and the consequences they create. – others can’t decide what happens to your phone, car, knife, gun, etc. – someone stealing your property is responsible for what they do with it. Negative rights are what you have a right to not have done to your property. Any one who infringes on these rights is trying to make a claim of ownership upon your property, which is ultimately derived from your 1st Natural Right of self-ownership, making it a claim of ownership upon you: i.e. slavery, evil, the destruction of freedom. Property Violations/Thefts (Slavery): – Murder – Rape – Assault – Coercion/duress – Theft – Trespass – Willful lying/deception (fraud) Wrong: Initiates harm (aggression, violence) Attempts to take other’s property, to be a ruler or master over others (Archonist, ruler). Property Rights (Freedom): – Life – Sexual association – Bodily integrity – Free will choice (actions, speech) – Standard (non-self) property – Security of your living domain – Ability to make informed decisions Right: Doesn’t initiate harm The right to not have property taken from you (Anarchist) Self-ownership is the first property one owns (body, life). Other properties are derived from self-ownership (original appropriation via labor, voluntary exchange). Freedom is the right to do what you want as long as it doesn’t infringe on other’s rights to do the same. Those who violate that right are violent, creating evil, destroying freedom. Evil is the destruction of freedom. Duress Is a continuous condition of coercion; of being threatened with violence in perpetuity. Coercion is the theft of free will, executed via a threat or act of violence to get someone to comply against their free will; to be prevented from engaging in their Natural Rights, or unjustly forced (violence) to engage in behavior against their will (e.g. taxation). “You will comply with my commands, my will, or you will receive violence.” Coercion can happen in particular instances and not persist. Duress is when coercion is the constant condition of life, always there, not a mere one-time occurrence. Everyone has the Natural Right to defend themselves against and stop this violence. Doing so is called justice. FORCE VS. VIOLENCE Force and violence are obfuscated and confused, leading to an inhibition or pacification of the Self-Defense Principle. Force: – Strength, power or energy e.g. move a ball; build; speak in opposition; stop violence. – based in Natural Rights/Law, a right. Violence: – unjust exercise of power/force e.g. force to violate rights; damage property. – violates Natural Rights/Law, not a right. Violence requires force, but force does not require violence. The root of violence and violation is vio/ (viole is rape in French) From Latin violare, from vis: force, strength. Using force against a violator (who is creating violence by violating rights) is not violence. It’s correcting a violation of rights, of morality. The initiator of harm is violating the volition of another to rightfully not be harmed. The initiator of violence is in violation of the Sacred Feminine Non-Aggression Principle (non-violence). The response to use force against violence is the Sacred Masculine Self-Defense Principle to stop the aggression or bring about justice for the theft-debt the violator created. Force: – ability to do something. – Capacity to cause change. – energy, power. – valid use of force that respects Natural Law (NL). – responds to violations of NL. – aright, not a wrong. – any degree of force to stop physical violations (SDP). – non-aggression principle (NAP). – proper use. – have a right to take. – backed by rights, posses the right to do. – right to stop/put down violence. – responsive. Violence: – abuse of force. – immoral use of physical force. – coerce, compel. – force used in violation of NL. – initiate action that violates NL. – not a right, a wrong. – aggression initiates violation of NL. – abuse. – don’t have a right to take. – don’t posses the right to do. – no right to initiate violence. – initiatory. Two actions can appear the same (swing a fist) but the type of behavior is different. e.g. swing to initiate violence vs. swing to put down violent aggressor. DO I/YOU HAVE THE RIGHT? – Do i have the right to hold someone in a continuous threat of physical violent action if they don’t comply with my will (i.e. duress)? You must subjugate your will to my will, as if I’m a God over you. – Do i have the right to say you must beg me for my approval to allow you to do something that doesn’t initiate harm? And if you do it without my approval i will come to physically restrict your movment and put you in a confined space that you can’t leave until i say so? – Do i have the right to say you must give me 30% of your paycheck, and if you don’t agree to me claiming this right, then i will find you and do physical violence to you? It doesn’t matter if you agree with what i will do with the money or not, I’m going to take it and spend it as i see fit. – Do you or do you not have the right to resist and stop someone like this? Must you be obliged to let someone do that to you? Either you accept someone having the “right” to make you their slave, or you don’t. – Imagine you trying to do this, would someone else not Nave the right to resist and defend themselves against your violence? – Since no one has the right to do any of this violence, can you — alone or united with others as a group — give that non-existent right to another individual or group to go do violence to others? – You can’t grant to others what you don’t have yourself. No amount of people grouped together can give, grant or delegate to others what they themselves don’t possess. If you don’t have $10, then you can’t give 10$ to someone, and you can’t delegate someone else to use the $10 that you don’t have. – lf you don’t think people have the Natural Right to resist and defend themselves against physical violence or the threat thereof (which is itself violence), then you have an undeveloped conscience and are in thrall (in a state of servitude or submission; accepting enslavement). – Right and morality objectively known > know what behaviors are right or wrong – Deny objectivity > moral relativist: you think that anyone who thinks they have a right to Steal, assault or murder others is right/correct to think they have that right, while contradictorily accepting (double think) that someone is right to think they have a right to not be stolen from, murdered, etc. If everyone just takes from others without permission then you have chaos as a consequence. Everyone violates the rights of others. That’s antithetical to the goal of social harmony and order that (mostly) everyone says they want. RIGHTS INHERENT IN EXISTENCE-REALITY-NATURE Method 1: Start at the individual that exists and work outward. Self (Individual) > Ownership > Property > Rights – You/I, the individual/self, exists in nature. Qualities/properties thereof exist. – Self-ownership is a quality or property of our individual existence: no one owns (controls, rules) the individual’s body but that individual. – You are you’re first property to do with as you please (so long as it doesn’t harm another). Your property exists in itself or as a quality of that primary substance. – Derivative property is acquired with your body via mixing labor with natural resources (original appropriation) or agreements to exchange goods/services (voluntary exchange). – You own your property, you have rights to use them in reality without initiating harm. Infringing on rightful property use is violence. Property rights are qualities or properties of rightful ownership that exist. – 7 main rights exist: life; sexual association; bodily integrity; free will choice; physical property; security of living domain; ability to make informed decisions. Method 2: Start at the collective universal: from a condition/state of reality towards what individual particular actions create that condition of reality. Reality > Outcome of behavior (freedom or slavery) > Created by behavior > Type/class of behavior > Moral or immoral > Right or wrong to do. – History shows continuous violence; violators claiming the “right” to do wrongs, claims of ownership, trying to legitimize slavery, creating degrees of enslavement by claims of ownership upon other’s property. – Behavior/action creates the resulting condition of the human world/reality. – Not just any behavior creates the enslavement, only certain types/classifications of behavior. Immoral behavior; theft of forms of property; violations of rights. – Violations of property rights is violence. The more there are, the more false claims of ownership exist as the collective condition, i.e. aggregate slavery. – Claiming to own the property of another is a claim of ownership upon them, i.e. enslavement. Collectively accepted immoral behavior leads to the demonstration of the negative aspect of the Law of Freedom, i.e. less freedom, more slavery. – Tolerating, accepting, justifying, normalizing, and standardizing violations of rights (immorality) = large scale enslavement. Right and wrong exist. Rights exist. SUMMARY OF TERMS Property: Self-ownership, and derivative properties rightfully acquired. Violence: Initating harm (wrongful force), which is to infringe on property. Force: Power exerted in reality; can be wrongful or rightful force. Rights: Do what you want with your rightful property that doesn’t initiate harm (violence); to not have violence enacted upon your property; unobstructed rightful use of your property (exception for travel when others are speaking against unrectified injustice). Non-Aggression Principle: Don’t violate rights. Self-Defense Prinicple: Use of defensive force against violence. Always remember: LEX REX; ‘The Law is King.’ Lex Naturalis Est Rex https://thegreatwork208716197.wordpress.com/2025/10/25/rights-cannot-be-made-into-wrongs-and-wrongs-cannot-be-made-into-rights-as-morality-increases-declines-freedom-increases-declines/.
